If logic has primitive ideas these must be
independent of one another. If a primitive idea is introduced
it must be introduced in all contexts in which it occurs at
all. One cannot therefore introduce it for one context
and then again for another. For example, if denial is
introduced, we must understand it in propositions of the form
"~p", just as in propositions like
"~(p v q)",
"(x) . ~fx" and others.
We may not first introduce it for oone class of cases and then
for another, for it would then remain doubtful whether its
meaning in the two cases was the same, and there would be no
reason to use the same way of symbolizing in the two cases.
(In short, what Frege ("Grundgesetze der
Arithmetik") has said about the introduction of
signs by definitions holds, mutatis mutandis, for the
introduction of primitive signs also.)